Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Mar 2012 22:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 512268
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-22
This whole concept of the publisher not getting any money from the original sale is complete non-sense. Many people would not buy the new game if they knew they could not sell the game and get something back out of it. The publisher did get money from a video game that was sold. They got the original $60 from the game. Whether Joe or Suzy is playing the game makes no difference, one copy is being used at all times.
Last time I checked games are bought not licensed. First sale doctrine applies, and becomes no different then selling a car. Do car dealerships get more money when one of their buyers sells the car? Of course not.
I won't be buying into the next generation of video games, if this non sense continues.