To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're right. I knew that and shouldn't have worded it that way. I guess what I meant to say was that I thought it was a shame that they exited the consumer operating system business.
I also think it was a shame they exited the PC business. Their machines were built to last and incredibly stable (or at least as stable as they could be running Microsoft Windows). My family, school, and then clients, used a lot of IBM hardware... The PS/2, PS/1, PS/ValuePoint, and NetVista machines. Even the Aptivas were incredibly proprietary but durable and very easy to maintain. Yeah, they weren't cheap, but they also weren't cheap, and I'm always amazed when I see clients running some older IBM desktops that are in much better shape than their 3 or 4 year old Dell boxes.




Member since:
2009-03-17
I always thought it was a shame that IBM exited the operating system business.
IBM still has rather large OS development groups, AIX, OS/400, Z/OS, etc.