To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
OEMs are still king, and while I can't speak for the situation overseas as I don't really know, that'd be my guess as to why Android has been the smashing success.
I mean, Google made the conscious choice to go for reach over quality. Maybe they wouldn't call it quality, but flexibility if you will. They are extremely flexible, you can turn Android into almost whatever you want, on whatever hardware you'd like.
So its a trade off, but to say they fought tooth and nail for their success in any kind of desperate capacity that other mobile OSes are trying to do now, is I think a little much. They kinda accidently fell into success, and are doing a great job at keeping their momentum.
Even if we remove IPhone from the picture (in most places outside handful of western countries it's still a niche, luxry product that common people doesn't care about) Android has delivered a major breakthrough in terms of touch UI compared to competition (Symbian, WinCE and featurephones). Before it smartphones were strictly highly priced business devices that compensated poor ui with enterprise integration. Soon after that the price race started and (along with Samsung Ace and HTC Wildfire and Xperia X8) Android has brought the smartphone to the masses.
Edited 2012-04-06 15:18 UTC
That is right. And if Google did not create the Open Handset Alliance there would be no Android adoption and OEMs would not push it.
It's not single party operation, like the language in your posts seems to suggest.
A) All great products have a good measure of luck associated with their creation and adoption. There is no single one that did not rely on luck to some degree.
B) And now Google is pushing it even farther. It's not like Google and other members of OHA just kicked Android off the top of the mountain to roll down at it's own speed.
for most of the markets outside the U.S price is the major driving factor IMHO seeing as some of the largest growth is being seen in the developing countries where the choice for a smart phone boils down to a sub 100 dollar phone potentially running the latest version of Android or a iOS device that costs easily three times the price.
It just doesn't add up.
Two things drive android (1) the amount of device choice (there is more than one model) and (2) price, when you can buy an android 2.x device on a pay as you go contract for under £100 (under £50 for some models) and own the device outright. Once momentum begins, your friends all have device X, that can really drive the take-up.





Member since:
2005-06-29
It had absolutely nothing to do with any kind of superiority, or what have you. It was simply great timing and great coordination with operators.
This doesn't explain the fact that even outside of the US - where carriers' influence is limited and most people buy phones at third party retailers, mixing and matching phones/carriers/plans - Android is growing just as fast.
It just doesn't add up.