To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oh, there was a discernible reason for not opening BeOS source code when BeOS went under: They sold it to Palm. The BeOS stockholders probably appreciated some partial return of their assets, after they missed out on the mother load that would have been the apple acquisition. I can blame palm/Access for doing nothing with it since their purchase. They should open source it.
The problem is that right now it reads as if to "do a BeOS" involves opening up the source code, and Thom is hoping that they therefore don't open up the code. The "don't" is ambiguous and can be seen to be modifying "do" and "open".
A more clear version would be: "At this point, I'm just hoping that they don't do a BeOS and that they open the QNX code before going belly-up." (Changed the end because three "they"'s would be too much.)




Member since:
2008-03-10
He means that BeOS didn't open the code for their OS, and that he hopes RIM don't do the same with QNX - that is, that RIM open sources the code for QNX before they, too, fall into oblivion. In other words, that RIM doesn't "do a BeOS" - that is, keep the code for no discernable reason.