Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Apr 2012 14:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 513405
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Or, alternatively, Windows Phone WILL gain market share. In that case Microsoft will simply kill Android, just like they killed BeOS, OS/2, WordPerfect, Linux of Netbooks etc.etc. etc.
They were not alone.
In many of such cases like OS/2 and WordPefect, their owner companies were actually responsible for the failure in the end, don't put the blame only on Microsoft.
IBM never knew how to sell OS/2 to the home users.
WordPerfect was killed by the company's own decisions,
http://www.wordplace.com/ap/
While it is true that Microsoft does not play nice, in the markets where it succeeds, it usually happens because the competition also does it own share of management errors.
RE[2]: Comment by PieterGen
by dsmogor on Tue 10th Apr 2012 11:48
in reply to "RE: Comment by PieterGen"





Member since:
2012-01-13
I love competition too. But Microsoft does not like competition. Therefore I don't think that the mobile market at large will benefit from Microsoft's presence in it.
Either Windows Phone (or Windows8 Mobile) stays small and remains an "also ran". In that case, neither iOS or Android will innovate faster because of Windows.
Or, alternatively, Windows Phone WILL gain market share. In that case Microsoft will simply kill Android, just like they killed BeOS, OS/2, WordPerfect, Linux of Netbooks etc.etc. etc.
In that case the net effect wil be a duo-poly of Microsoft and Apple, just like in the desktop market. (The two friends MS and Apple).
So the article title should have been "Competition is King, why we don't need Microsoft in the Mobile Market".