To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
@gonzo
Yes, people are forced to buy Windows. Microsoft uses it market power in an unhealthy way. For instance, it is hardly possible to buy a laptop with no OS installed. If vendors would sell Linux-preinstalled laptops, Microsoft punishes them by no longer giving them discounts. Only very few large vendors may, on a small scale, sell linux laptops. Such as Dell. Somewhere 12 levels deep in their website you might find a linux machine. This seems to serve as an excuse to the authorities "look, there is free competition!"
There is lots of documented proof of this. For instance, the first netbooks had often Linux, until MS killed that, with a combination of stick ("if the manufacturer would install Linux they would lose the Microsoft discounts) and carrot (extra discounts, money).
The analogy with Apple is flawed because of market shares. Having 90% marketshare means that that company must comply free competition laws. Apple is smaller and therefore is given more leeway.
I am not an Apple fan, I think Apple is a patent troll. Especially in the mobile market. But in the PC market, Apple never tries to limit the general public's choice. They only limit Apple users' choice by tying them to their iWorld.
If you look at the technical OS quality, I think it's fair to say that Linux, Windows and OSX are all fairly good. Of course, in my view Linux is the absolute leader in terms of innovation, speed & stability. Amazon has the same experience. If you look at cloud prices, you will see that linux machines have better uptime and lower costs. By a fair margin!
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
No. You can buy Mac, can't you?
People don't want Linux, it's that simple. It sucks.
Microsoft uses it market power in an unhealthy way. For instance, it is hardly possible to buy a laptop with no OS installed. If vendors would sell Linux-preinstalled laptops, Microsoft punishes them by no longer giving them discounts.
Not so sure. Until 2000., maybe, but after DOJ took action against MS, I don't think that is longer the case.
Why can't you accept that there is no enough demand for Linux?
For example: piracy is high with Windows. So, those people DO have a choice: steal Windows or use free Linux. And what do they do?
Edited 2012-04-10 18:10 UTC
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
I was discussing desktop systems mostly.
MS is not aiming for lower prices than Linux, same way Apple doesn't want to compete with PC vendors on price point.




Member since:
2005-11-10
True.
However, what you said, is still invalid. Nobody is forcing people to buy Windows, they do have choice.