Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Apr 2012 08:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 513631
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
While I agree that KDE 3.5 was equal to, if not superior to GNOME 2.x, KDE 4.x still has issues with release QA and, last I checked, they seemed to think that "the same thing happened with earlier releases of KDE 2 and KDE 3" justifies the problem.
It used to be that, no matter what desktop I was trying, Konqueror 3.5 was my file manager and tabbed KPart harness. These days, I either use Trinity (that KDE 3.5 fork) or LXDE.
Darn shame too. KDE 4 has a ton of potential if they could just muster the focus to fix bugs and optimize for performance before they chase after each shiny new idea.




Member since:
2007-03-26
Sadly KDE (and Qt as a whole) seems to be a second class citizen on most distros, which is a real shame as (in my opinion at least - please lets not turn this into a KDE vs GNOME flamewar!) KDE is every bit as good as the other DEs.
Let's just hope Kubuntu will be less crappy than it was when Canonical managed it.