Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Apr 2012 21:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 513732
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Android would not need the cash infusion that WP got from MSFT.
Only WP needs it because it is long dead in the water and being resucitated by billions of marketing dollars.
Only a fraction of that money might have given MeeGo the final polish it needed.
Only WP needs it because it is long dead in the water and being resucitated by billions of marketing dollars.
Only a fraction of that money might have given MeeGo the final polish it needed.
I was having a serious discussion with a serious person. Reconsider the value add of your post and try again.
People who still think MeeGo(which wasn't even MeeGo, it was Maemo with a new skin) had the ecosystem it needed to survive are inebriated. I know its what you wish happened, but it didn't. Get over it. Your year long grudge is beyond tiring.
Nokia was in dire financial straits, yet you argue them spending undeniably more money engineering their own concoction would've left them in a better position. Unbelievable.





Member since:
2005-11-29
Are you asking about Windows Phone, or Microsoft’s financial support?
I think WP was the wrong choice for them, Meego at the very least was a competent smart phone platform they already had. If you want to argue over ecosystem, neither WP or Meego had them so they both were starting from the same point. But even with Meego, Nokia were behind the times for a modern smart phone.
Dare I say that Nokia could have easily brought Android to their feature phone and smart phone ranges and be on their way this summer to be 2nd or 1st in Android phone makers. "
Fair enough. I don't know how practical Android was. I mean I can't fathom Google providing the raw cash infusions or advertising support MSFT does.
I also dont know if the margins on Android sales wold be as high as they are for Windows Phone. Being the WP7 "Savior" also affords them this elevated status which keeps them in the news. I think they and MSFT had a pretty mutually beneficial relationship.
I worry about had Nokia gone with Android their ability to be as nimble, Nokia reportedly worked very, very close with MSFT which likely led to faster to market times.
However, Android also brings many advantages like broader hardware and more mind share so you may have a point. I just find the android OEM market really cutthroat for the wounded Nokia, I mean even HTC is having trouble.