Linked by James Ingraham on Thu 12th Apr 2012 22:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 513938
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That statement is just silly. Have you actually used the software I just mentioned. I usually do a lot of live audio processing with very cpu intensive plugins like impulse response. On other platforms, the norm seems to be to record with a raw monitor signal, and apply effects afterwards because the system can't handle doing this without using large buffers.
RE[2]: Jackd, that's why!
by No it isnt on Fri 13th Apr 2012 07:42
in reply to "RE: Jackd, that's why!"
Not really, unless you define 'serious' as 'serious amateur', using Fruityloops or Garageband or whatever kids like these days. On the other hand, 'serious' might be 'serious work', in which case things like Csounds or Ardour and Linux might be what you want to use.
There are plenty of musicians and audio engineers out there who aren't technophobic imbeciles.
RE[2]: Jackd, that's why!
by Soulbender on Fri 13th Apr 2012 13:02
in reply to "RE: Jackd, that's why!"





Member since:
2009-03-01
If you want to do serious audio work in Linux, you would need a rt-capable kernel to run Jackd reliable. It is required by Ardour, Linux-sampler, Hydrogen (the list goes on).
I used to muck about with custom kernels, but now i just use av-linux which comes with everything you need for a Linux based studio. If you are both a musician and a Linux-user, you really should check out Ardour, it's a full featured DAW that can be compared to anything other platforms have to offer, except maybe a lack of bling.