Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Apr 2012 19:05 UTC
Legal "Former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov, who downloaded source code for the investment firm's high-speed trading system from the company's computers, was wrongly charged with theft of property because the code did not qualify as a physical object under a federal theft statute, according to a court opinion published Wednesday." This could be a huge deal, if it ever were to be upheld in higher courts. More specifically, "because Aleynikov did not 'assume physical control' over anything when he took the source code, and because he did not thereby 'deprive [Goldman] of its use', Aleynikov did not violate the [National Stolen Property Act]". Well paint me purple with white and red dots and call me a girl scout.
Thread beginning with comment 513970
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by anevilyak
by Soulbender on Fri 13th Apr 2012 02:05 UTC in reply to "Comment by anevilyak"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

You'll note they also pointed out that it would've been different if he'd, e.g. smuggled the code out on a CD or USB drive, since in that case a physical object would've been involved.


I'll have to disagree with them on that unless it was the company's USB stick or CD. If he used his own USB stick he still would not have stolen any physical property.
But yeah, that doesn't mean he's not guilty of something.

Reply Parent Score: 4