Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Apr 2012 18:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 513997
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In terms of Apple's definition of "retina display", it means >300 ppi (pixels per inch) displays.
iPad n3w says no to that, it only has 264ppi
300ppi was chosen because it has something to do with the maximum ppi that the human eye can detect or see.
Right. It’s not strictly a defined ppi, but a minimal size of a pixel at the typical usage distance. From their blurb, it is ‘57 arcseconds per pixel’.
Exactly. It's just a marketing term, not a specification based on resolution, screen size, pixel size, etc.
Thus, it shouldn't be used to describe anything other than Apple Retina Displays (TM).
It's actually kind of revolting that Intel would try to market "retina displays" instead of listing the actual DPI of the screen.




Member since:
2006-11-13
In terms of Apple's definition of "retina display", it means >300 ppi (pixels per inch) displays.
300ppi was chosen because it has something to do with the maximum ppi that the human eye can detect or see. Well, something in that lines.
I can't remember the exact Apple URL where I read this. I'll try and find it again.