Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Apr 2012 18:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 514008
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Exactly. It's just a marketing term, not a specification based on resolution, screen size, pixel size, etc.
Thus, it shouldn't be used to describe anything other than Apple Retina Displays (TM).
It's actually kind of revolting that Intel would try to market "retina displays" instead of listing the actual DPI of the screen.




Member since:
2005-07-06
iPad n3w says no to that, it only has 264ppi
Right. It’s not strictly a defined ppi, but a minimal size of a pixel at the typical usage distance. From their blurb, it is ‘57 arcseconds per pixel’.