To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
When you are working with a tablet/touchscreen the size of everything in Metro makes it easier because fingers are not a precision pointing device. I get that. The mouse however IS a precision pointing device and it makes working with Metro start screen and apps a huge waste of movement and time. That they are trying to force-feed everyone this in a desktop oriented OS is in fact ridiculous.
The complete removal of the old start panel was the last straw for me - i think i could somehow live with it if they left that alone so I could work with the desktop without switching to the tiles every few minutes.
With fullscreen apps/metro you are either writing an email or reading a document or watching a video or starting another application. Every time you choose to switch to another task you loose the sight of everything else. You can sort of do a 1-3 split of your screen but it is no way as quick and comfortable as just moving the window around with a mouse or opening another program from the start menu.
I can move my mouse across my 22inch screen in less than an inch and still remain accurate.
It is the same functionality just laid out differently, honestly, I find using the current start menu very slow compared to the start screen. I have to focus on a tiny area of the screen and navigate through hierarchy of menus.
Even using keyboard Shortcuts it is hard, while Win7 has the search, it searches everything. I only want to search for programs.
What people don't get about the start screen it actually works better with a keyboard.
Metro apps aren't for tiling. That is what the classic desktop is for.





Member since:
2005-11-09
how is it ridiculous?
It is a start screen rather than a start menu. If you are still desktop focused, then you will interact with Metro apps just like you interact with desktop apps, but they will be full screen only.