Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Apr 2012 20:56 UTC
Legal "Abstract ideas, laws of nature, and mathematical formulas can't be patented under US law, and both Google and Verizon want the US Supreme Court to better define the bounds of that legal tenet as it applies to Internet technologies. Google and Verizon recently filed a joint amicus curiae brief in the case of WildTangent v. Ultramercial, asking America's highest court to formally clarify that an unpatentable abstract idea, such as a method of advertising, can't magically become patentable subject matter by simply implementing it over the Internet. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has also filed an amicus brief in the case similarly asking the court to assign understandable boundaries to patentable subject matter." This should be fun.
Thread beginning with comment 514552
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: This won't work
by Neolander on Tue 17th Apr 2012 17:13 UTC in reply to "RE: This won't work"
Member since:

Well, judges don't care about prior art when it's about scrolling in a GUI, why would they care when it's about racket ? ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1