Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Apr 2012 03:19 UTC, submitted by Marc Geerlings
Thread beginning with comment 514676
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
Should perhaps be noted that this is 16-bit 'per-channel' and not 16-bit total color space. I can't say I've ever been hampered by this myself but then again I'm probably as far away from a professional photographer/retoucher/etc as you can be and of course having 65536 (I assume?) possible levels beats having only 256 in terms of flexibility and precision.
As for the Photoshop/Gimp gui thing, apart from single window mode I've always thought they were extremely similar although obviously not matching 1:1, I tried single window mode in the current Gimp dev version and I found that I prefer the floating window mode, YMMV but either way it's good that both preferences are supported from now on.