Linked by David Adams on Fri 20th Apr 2012 01:31 UTC, submitted by fsmag
Thread beginning with comment 514932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Good idea, but seems just a tad bit too constrained
by WereCatf on Fri 20th Apr 2012 10:54
in reply to "RE: Good idea, but seems just a tad bit too constrained"
Hehe, more seriously, I appreciate that benefit we all get from open technologies, but I don't see this gaining much traction. It just seems like the proposed media format doesn't offer a compelling advantage over existing technology that's been in use for years.
I suppose the aim is for people who like to keep a physical copy of all their movies and whatnot in such a format that will be readable far into the future, and for Indie filmmakers and such who may not wish to or who may not be able to afford all the various kinds of license fees needed to make BluRay - and/or DVD - discs. The license fees can apparently be really costly and as such a media format that is free of such seems like a rather good idea and will allow these people to use their budget for actual filming instead.
RE[3]: Good idea, but seems just a tad bit too constrained
by Digitante on Sat 21st Apr 2012 03:05
in reply to "RE[2]: Good idea, but seems just a tad bit too constrained"
"Hehe, more seriously, I appreciate that benefit we all get from open technologies, but I don't see this gaining much traction. It just seems like the proposed media format doesn't offer a compelling advantage over existing technology that's been in use for years.
I suppose the aim is for people who like to keep a physical copy of all their movies and whatnot in such a format that will be readable far into the future, and for Indie filmmakers and such who may not wish to or who may not be able to afford all the various kinds of license fees needed to make BluRay - and/or DVD - discs. The license fees can apparently be really costly "
Exactly.
I'm very conscious that Lib-Ray is almost certainly going to remain a niche product alongside proprietary standards like DVD and Blu-Ray. What I'm doing is embracing that, and trying to make it good at that role.
Thus I'm considering things like ease of producing Lib-Ray releases in small runs (because indie filmmakers and free culture projects often need to do that).
People are already working around the Blu-Ray problem. The Blender Foundation, for example, has released HD video on data DVD-ROMs. But there's not really a defined standard for it, and that's what I wanted to fix.




Member since:
2011-01-28
Isn't this going to be kind of limited use without support for 0x10c programs?
http://www.osnews.com/story/25765/Notch_unveils_0x10c_space_sim_wit...
Hehe, more seriously, I appreciate that benefit we all get from open technologies, but I don't see this gaining much traction. It just seems like the proposed media format doesn't offer a compelling advantage over existing technology that's been in use for years.
I'd be more interested in an open spec for running some arbitrary unlocked apps on a media center PC. Media centers like Tivo, xbox, etc are powerful, if only they weren't so locked down. Adding more advanced programming features would help set this apart from "just another DVD player", for example.