Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source "A new analysis of licensing data shows that not only is use of the GPL and other copyleft licenses continuing to decline, but the rate of disuse is actually accelerating." This shouldn't be surprising. The GPL is complex, and I honestly don't blame both individuals and companies opting for simpler, more straightforward licenses like BSD or MIT-like licenses.
Thread beginning with comment 515108
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Complexity?
by No it isnt on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:40 UTC
No it isnt
Member since:
2005-11-14

Seriously?

Reply Score: 7

RE: Complexity?
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:54 in reply to "Complexity?"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Seriously?


GPLv3: 5120 words.
Modified BSD license: 220 words.

I rest my case.

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[2]: Complexity?
by porcel on Sat 21st Apr 2012 20:18 in reply to "RE: Complexity?"
porcel Member since:
2006-01-28

You may rest your case on the complexity issue, but the GPL v3 is a much better license on many fronts,, but particularly if you care about the issue of software patents as you seem to care.

I seriously doubt that GPL use is declining. It remains the license of choice for about sixty percent of projects, according to the article┬┤s data and their projections may very well never be realized.

Of course, big proprietary vendors have been speaking ill of the GPL for a long time now and their marketing departments has spent a lot of money casting doubts and aspersions on the GPL, simply because it does not allow the release of proprietary software based on said code, something that the BSD license does allow.

In any case, software developers should think about what they want their project to be.

Would the Linux kernel exist today without the GPL and the friendly ecosystem around the code that it helped build?

I doubt so.

Reply Parent Score: 9

RE[2]: Complexity?
by No it isnt on Sun 22nd Apr 2012 09:05 in reply to "RE: Complexity?"
No it isnt Member since:
2005-11-14

Sure. So it's more complex. But you seriously believe complexity comes into consideration? The GPL isn't difficult to understand., but v3 sucks if you're an evil corporation.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Complexity?
by ToddB on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 15:54 in reply to "RE: Complexity?"
ToddB Member since:
2012-01-25

That is very important, we are programmers not lawyers. Most of us would rather not have a license at all, but unfortunately due to how insane everyone seems to have become over copyright it is a necessity. So a short license that is readable at a glance much appreciated, I have tried to read the GPL several times and I still don't understand what is and isn't acceptable use of source.. So I avoid it.

Reply Parent Score: 1