Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Honestly, the only people who seem to get excited by this sort of thing are hard-core GNU freetards who believe that everyone who doesn't accept their extreme ideology is evil.
How is "I expect to be paid back through code when you use my code" extreme or ideological? Sounds pretty pragmatic to me.
Sorry, but "freedom, even if it means freedom to not pay back/forward", IS ideological.
Nothing wrong with ideological. Don't use ideological in a pejorative sense.
"It`s like the beos crowd here isn`t it. Where companies are worshipped, and GPL and linux uncool.
It's nothing - nothing - to do with what's cool or uncool. It's to do with people finding that the GPL places restrictions on their code - and on the use of their code by others - that they find to be utterly objectionable. "
This is a commonly expressed viewpoint, but it is a complete red herring.
The GPL doesn't apply to THEIR code (unless they want it to). The GPL only applies to code someone else wrote and placed under the GPL.
The recipient of GPL code simply doesn't get the luxury to find the restrictions of the GPL objectionable, because it isn't their code to which those restrictions apply.
Edited 2012-04-22 02:00 UTC




Member since:
2010-10-27
It's nothing - nothing - to do with what's cool or uncool. It's to do with people finding that the GPL places restrictions on their code - and on the use of their code by others - that they find to be utterly objectionable.
Honestly, the only people who seem to get excited by this sort of thing are hard-core GNU freetards who believe that everyone who doesn't accept their extreme ideology is evil.
Edited 2012-04-21 23:03 UTC