Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515170
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If your statistics were accurate, you'd see that it's you who is wrong about this, not the linked article.
GPL usage is actually growing, just at about 10% of the adoption rate of other licenses. This means that the line you're extrapolating should be non-linear, i.e. an inverse proportion graph.
This means that your projection is probably off by at least 5 years
RE[2]: A really stupid post
by Excarnate on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 03:29
in reply to "RE: A really stupid post"





Member since:
2011-08-01
Hey Thom, you need to up your standards. When you post a link to something as stupid as this:
""...if the current rate of decline continues, we project that the GPL family of licenses will account for only 50% of all open source software by September 2012."
How about this?
"If the current rate of decline continues, we project that the GPL family of licenses will account for 0% of all open source software by May 2013."
I was generous graphing their numbers. Given the quote as is in the article, it is really appallingly stupid.