Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 22nd Apr 2012 17:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515303
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-13
I find that most of the time, the people who are whining about other people whining about changes actually LIKE the changes. If you don't like the change, why should you keep quiet about it, instead of letting these companies know how you feel? If Facebook throws on a new 'time line' feature that is an absolute clusterf**k, and Google+ gets ruined with a redesign where half the page is nothing but white space, what exactly is gained if all the people who hate it stay silent and just grit their teeth?
I am not a Gmail user, so can't comment on that redesign, but I think a lot of these companies would be well served to throw up a 'proof of concept' page to let users play around with it before committing to any major changes. But most of them don't do this, and we all end up suffering for it. In almost every single case, when a website does a complete makeover, the new design is a big step down from the old one.
Edited 2012-04-23 00:52 UTC