Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Apr 2012 20:09 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 515335
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Why so much misunderstanding?
by AdamW on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 15:56
in reply to "RE[3]: Why so much misunderstanding?"
No-one outside of Canonical actually knows if they're profitable or not, as it's a private company and doesn't have to report financials. I don't believe anyone there has said that they're profitable yet; but it's been a while since the last time anyone said definitely that they weren't. So right now we just don't know whether they are.




Member since:
2006-02-01
RHEL is also a desktop product, albeit, non-free, but then you can get it for free with CentOS or Scientific Linux. Also most of the work of FC goes to serve as based of future version of RHEL, meaning that a lot of FC packages are maintained by Red-Hat employees. And finally, Red Hat is the largest corporate contributor to the Gnome project (a desktop project).
Red Hat has not given up the linux desktop, they have given up the linux desktop for consumers, there is little to no money to make in that area.
Cannonical is still barely profitable, and they only managed to reach that point after years of sponsorship by Shuttleworth, which has basically kills all the existing competition on the consumer market (ie Mandriva, SuSE...).