Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 16:29 UTC
Mac OS X Adam Fields and Perry Metzger have been investigating the serious performance issues people are experiencing with Lion. "Frequent beachballs, general overall slowness and poor UI responsivness, specific and drastic slowdowns on every Time Machine run, high memory utilization in Safari Web Content, mds, and kernel_task processes, large numbers of page outs even with a good deal of available RAM, and high amounts of RAM marked as inactive which is not readily freed back to other applications, with page outs favored." Apparently the issue is that the "virtual memory manager is bad at managing which pages should be freed from the inactive state and which ones should be paged out to disk". I won't make myself popular with a certain part of our readership, but really, is this considered a new problem? Mac OS X has always had terrible memory management, and where Windows has continuously become better at it, Mac OS X seems to have been stagnant and even getting worse. This is what happens when the company earns 2/3s of its revenue somewhere else.
Thread beginning with comment 515409
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Editorial?
by tylerdurden on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 19:13 UTC in reply to "RE: Editorial?"
Member since:

But you still need to learn, that as a good journalist you should check to make sure whether or not your perception and the reality of the situation match.

That which sounds logical and correlated to you, may not be what really is happening inside that specific organization.

Reply Parent Score: -2

RE[3]: Editorial?
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 19:17 in reply to "RE[2]: Editorial?"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:

And you still need to learn that OSNews is a blog, and has been since its inception in 1997. OSNews editors editorialise. We always have. Deal with it.

Reply Parent Score: 6