Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 16:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515422
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm quite sure that the memory manager of OSX wasn't derived from BSD, but from Mach. Actually, FreeBSD has adapted that memory manager, so it's rather the other way around.
That was ages ago... FreeBSD inherited its Virtual Memory Management system from the original Berkeley codebase, which itself was modeled after the Mach VMM - but that was back in the 80s.
Afaik the two codebases haven't seen each other for nearly 30 years. At this point I would say they are probably still architecturally similar but completely different when it comes to the nuts and bolts of how they are implemented. Mach has stagnated for the last 20 years or so - BSD has not.




Member since:
2007-07-27
I'm quite sure that the memory manager of OSX wasn't derived from BSD, but from Mach. Actually, FreeBSD has adapted that memory manager, so it's rather the other way around. But Apple might learn from the way FreeBSD does things. If it is feasible, as the kernel is quite different.