Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Apr 2012 17:39 UTC
Google Well, this has been a very, very long time in the making. Google has finally unveiled its big Dropbox competitor: Google Drive. You start with 5GB for free, and you can go all the way to 1TB for $50 per month. This is a big deal for many (if you were to use rumouring as a gauge), but all I can think of is this: why on earth would you entrust your files to a company - any company - whose sole interest is extracting money from you, and who, to boot, is subject to crazy American laws?
Thread beginning with comment 515617
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Radio
by WorknMan on Wed 25th Apr 2012 00:42 UTC in reply to "Comment by Radio"
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

even if the US laws where more lenient, even if Google was doing it fully as a non-profit, in fact even if you could find a safe country where to store your files with an organisation with high moral standards, it doesn't matter: never trust anybody to take care of your own security.


This. Even if your data is on a server hosted by a company you trust, in a country you trust, there's no guarantee that server isn't going to get hacked. In other words, whether your sensitive data is on your local hard drive or on a server somewhere else, it BETTER be encrypted and/or at least password protected. In that case, it doesn't really matter WHERE you store it.

As for setting up your own storage solution, that's all fine and good, until a fire or tornado comes along and renders your storage solution useless. As for me, there is some data that I absolutely cannot afford to lose, so I want to have at least a backup copy 'off site' somewhere. I would NEVER store my primary copy in the cloud though.

In regard to my data and privacy, I don't think that either Google or the government would be interested in things such as my fitness routines, grocery lists, code snippets, etc. The only thing remotely 'juicy' is my journal, which is password protected. And even if it were decrypted by someone, and they were able to figure out which app they needed to read it, there's not anything in there that's going to get me fired, or in trouble with the law.

Basically, my point is this... if data that you absolutely need to keep secret is not secure enough so you could put it on a server owned by your worst enemy, it's probably not secure enough.

Reply Parent Score: 4

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06


if data that you absolutely need to keep secret is not secure enough so you could put it on a server owned by your worst enemy, it's probably not secure enough


That has to be the quote of the week. +100!

Reply Parent Score: 2

theninth Member since:
2009-08-20

Yeah! That's a great idea - until that day some genius found out a way to factor large primes (but maybe were toast that day anyway)

Reply Parent Score: 1