Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Apr 2012 20:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515661
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Perhaps he got it a bit backwards, but quickly checking the most straightforward place and doing a ctrl+f gives:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel#Slowing_demand_and_challenges_to...
The lawsuits were noted to significantly burden the competition with legal bills, even if Intel lost the suits.[27]
"Bill Gates Speaks", page 29. ISBN 978-0-471-40169-8
"Bill Gates Speaks", page 29. ISBN 978-0-471-40169-8
Perhaps he got it a bit backwards... Intel specifically worked to stop 2nd sources by then, and through litigation blocked AMD386 for many years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Am386
(or: it was a bit like he says, but 286 & 386, not 386 & 486)
Yeah, many might scoff at it "oh, over 2 decades ago" ...but all this shaped the present landscape. Plus Intel didn't play nice a mere less than a decade ago, which quite possibly impacted resources AMD could direct towards R&D and fab development.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_v._Intel
In November 2009, Intel agreed to pay AMD $1.25 billion as part of a deal to settle all outstanding legal disputes between the two companies.[6][7]
You don't just pay such amount if your hands are clean. Then there's 250 million to Transmeta and:
In May 2009, the EU found that Intel had engaged in anti-competitive practices and subsequently fined Intel €1.06 billion (US$1.44 billion)




Member since:
2007-07-27
Do you have links on this? Sorry, but I am not going to trust a post on the internet, without more proof...