Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Apr 2012 20:36 UTC
Google I wasn't just wrong, I was being an idiot. "When Google was in the thick of Android's development in 2006 and 2007 - long before the platform ever reached retail - it was a very different product, almost unrecognizable compared to the products we used today. Documents dated May of 2007 and made public during the course of Oracle's lawsuit against Google over its use of Java in Android show off a number of those preliminary user interface elements, prominently marked 'subject to change', and you can see how this used to be a product focused on portrait QWERTY devices." I'm hoping I can dive into this a little deeper tomorrow; since it's the busiest period of the year for my little company right now, I don't have the time to do it today. Just to make sure nobody thinks I'm just going to ignore this, I figured it'd be a good idea to post a quickie today. I'll get back to this tomorrow, or Friday at the latest.
Thread beginning with comment 515813
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Why Steve hates android
by smashIt on Thu 26th Apr 2012 20:13 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Why Steve hates android"
Member since:

the Prada was the first phone with a full touch interface - not the iPhone.

what do you think of the sagem wa3050 from 2001?

the important stuff even has finger-sized icons ;)

and i know there was one from siemens in the 90s but i've forgotten what it was called...

Edited 2012-04-26 20:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3