
"Sir Jonathan Ive
has been crowned British Visionary Innovator in a competition, run by the Intellectual Property Office. Ive won by a large margin with almost fifty per cent of the vote (46.6%). In second place was Sir Tim Berners-Lee (inventor of the world wide web) with 18.8 per cent of the vote. James Goodfellow OBE (the inventor of PIN technology and the cash machine) was in third place with 15.2 per cent of the vote." Alan Turing was also nominated. If you ever needed an illustration of everything that's wrong with the technology industry today, it's this. Guy who designs the
exterior of mass-market gadgets wins over guys who actually really contributed to technology. Telling.
Member since:
2008-06-02
Congrats, only 2 sentences in and you've already managed to shoot your own argument in the foot. And I can demonstrate that with 2 simple questions.
1) What precisely is it that Ives-designed products "do for people" (your words) that is of any real significance?
2) And would any of those things be possible without the work done by Berners-Lee and Turing?
The answer to 2 is obviously "no" - meaning that Berners-Lee's and Turing's contributions are infinitely more important than Ives'. Unless, of course, your answer to question 1 is "give people warm, fuzzy feelings."