Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Apr 2012 01:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 516046
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: The irony here...
by moondevil on Sat 28th Apr 2012 06:54
in reply to "RE[2]: The irony here..."
RE[4]: The irony here...
by tanishaj on Sun 29th Apr 2012 03:10
in reply to "RE[3]: The irony here..."
I fear that if Oracle wins, the repercussions will affect more than just Java.
It depends how Oracle wins.
1) The court decides APIs are copyrightable. This would be a disaster but there is a tonne of that precedent says this will not happen (look at the history of UNIX for example)
2) Patents. Terrible but nothing new (plus patents are basically out of the case now)
3) Other license/copyright issues - probably will not have much applicability outside of Java
Personally, I do not expect a very sizable settlement or much interesting precedent to emerge out of this case.




Member since:
2010-12-22
So did Sun, time changes things, but of courseā¦
Wait for the verdict. "
Actually, Sun did not.
1) They actively pursued Java licensing
2) They insisted on passing the TCK to call it Java
3) You were not allowed to "superset" the language
4) If you did not pass the TCK, they did not provide a patent grant
The kind of suit that Oracle has brought against Google would not have been possIble if Sun had offered the same patent grants and binding promises not to sue that Microsoft has.