Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Apr 2012 20:28 UTC
BeOS & Derivatives "During the coding period, I will first work on the boot loader. I intend to modify the existing x86 boot loader so that it is capable of loading both a 32-bit Haiku kernel and a 64-bit one. Once this is done, I will work on implementing the x86_64 architecture functionality in the kernel. Finally, I will port modules and drivers to the 64-bit kernel. Should I have time, I will also begin work on porting userland." Heck. Yes.
Thread beginning with comment 516294
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: fast or slow
by einr on Mon 30th Apr 2012 09:20 UTC in reply to "fast or slow"
Member since:

All it took, to make most windows systems faster was a simple line of boot code, specifying a 32 bit system. Yes the default was to process as a 386/486.

This makes no sense. The 386 and 486 were both fully 32-bit processors.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: fast or slow
by Andre on Mon 30th Apr 2012 10:08 in reply to "RE: fast or slow"
Andre Member since:

Every x86 processor, including the latest x86_64 bit (unless you have a legacy free machine, but most computers still have a BIOS (or BIOS emulation))
initialise in real mode. The oldest 16 bit mode, in wich they run like the ancient 8086/8088.

I think the speed difference being referred to is related to communicating with the hardware directly in stead of using BIOS calls (which happened in real mode)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: fast or slow
by JLF65 on Mon 30th Apr 2012 17:52 in reply to "RE: fast or slow"
JLF65 Member since:

The primary difference between Pentiums and newer vs 486 and older was the introduction of Virtual Interrupts. That simplified and sped up the interrupt handling for user mode code, making a significant difference in speed and coding for "enhanced" mode software on the x86. Intel would later work Virtual Ints into certain models of the 486 for people who wished the feature without needing to update the entire computer.

When you see software that runs on a Pentium/586 or better, and not on older hardware, that's usually the hardware that's being relied on that prevents it from being used on the older CPUs. Particularly with OSes, which need to handle both user and kernel modes.

Reply Parent Score: 2