Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th May 2012 02:56 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Ron Amadeo argues that the SIII is ugly because it was designed by lawyers. "So there you have it. A darn-near perfect explanation of the GSIII design. Sure, it's butt ugly, but it's also 100% (well maybe 90%) lawyer approved. An amorphous, unsymmetrical blob that doesn't come in black, with a non-permanent dock and non-square icons. There's no way Apple can add this design to their Samsung lawsuit." Sure would explain how Samsung went from the elegantly understated SII to this monstrosity of a phone. Anyone out there who actually likes the SIII's 'design'? If so, care to explain why?
Thread beginning with comment 517133
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Sat 5th May 2012 04:08 UTC
Luminair
Member since:
2007-03-30

sgs3 isnt THAT ugly. monstrosity I wouldnt say.

either way I don't care, what is more interesting is the increasing size. new phones haven't stopped growing. and I don't think they've stopped with SGS3, either

Reply Score: 6

RE: Comment by Luminair
by Moredhas on Sun 6th May 2012 04:32 in reply to "Comment by Luminair"
Moredhas Member since:
2008-04-10

I have a Note now, if I'm to keep up my trend of having larger phones, my next phone will be a 7" tablet, and after that, a 10" one!

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Luminair
by broken_symlink on Sun 6th May 2012 14:58 in reply to "RE: Comment by Luminair"
broken_symlink Member since:
2005-07-06

If you stick with samsung, the correct progression is 7, 7.7, 8.9, 10.

Reply Parent Score: 2