To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yeah Dream had a capacitive touch screen, unique keyboard mechanism, 3G data, compass, accelerometer, new chipset, etc. It was intended to be what its name says.
Maybe from earlier on it would have been a better plan to design a device based on a different existing device that was somewhere between Sooner and Dream, and not do Dream at all. Or maybe not -- ultimately as I said the software schedule was as much a factor as the hardware schedule, so pulling in the hardware schedule wouldn't have necessarily gotten a product out earlier.
As it is, I think it worked out well. We got the Dream hardware and Android platform software done around the same time, and Dream gave us something of an "everything and the kitchen sink" device to help guide the platform: supporting both landscape and portrait as primary orientations due to the keyboard, capacitive touch screen and DPAD focus navigation, compass, accelerometer, GPS, etc. Having a platform that worked from the start with that device has I think been really good for us.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Any reason in particular for not using then, as a base (at least for early development phones, not necessarily the launched one), the existing Windows Mobile HTC touch handsets?
I think I remember some of them even getting community created Android builds...