Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2012 21:05 UTC, submitted by Francis
Thread beginning with comment 517389
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Perhaps the difference will grow
by jessesmith on Wed 9th May 2012 01:48
in reply to "RE: Perhaps the difference will grow"
That sort of misses my point.
Besides which, LO could still be a test bed for features that eventually could make it into AOO. The actual code may not flow from LO to AOO, but the features, the ideas, could be copied if they were found to be successful. Lots of open source projects copy features without using the same code.
RE[2]: Perhaps the difference will grow
by Finalzone on Wed 9th May 2012 08:00
in reply to "RE: Perhaps the difference will grow"
RE[3]: Perhaps the difference will grow
by ssokolow on Wed 9th May 2012 10:16
in reply to "RE[2]: Perhaps the difference will grow"
" Except that Fedora is a testbed for RHEL, not the other way around.
That statement needs to die a trillion death. Fedora is the base for RHEL much like Debian unstable was or still is the base for Ubuntu "
So... it needs to die a trillion deaths because it's wrong in such a subtle way that I can't tell the difference between what I said and what you said even with you pointing out its existence?
RE[3]: Perhaps the difference will grow
by Jason Bourne on Thu 10th May 2012 02:11
in reply to "RE[2]: Perhaps the difference will grow"





Member since:
2010-01-21
Except that Fedora is a testbed for RHEL, not the other way around.
OpenOffice is now Apache licensed while LibreOffice retained the original OpenOffice LGPL license.
That means that OpenOffice is at a disadvantage because any big, killer features in OpenOffice can be ported to LibreOffice but not vice-versa.
Edited 2012-05-08 23:31 UTC