To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Agreed, but my point is that doing this is, technically, illegal under several countries's laws.
Sure, nobody care a lot, but if in order to play a DVD under VLC the media content industry tolerates a little law violation, how this same industry can have any credibility calling the law in others cases!?
It's either legal or illegal. They can't cherrypick at will. As some others here stated, this same industry is often found violated copyrights of others, artists for start.
It's the point here: there is no "right way". It's all about calling something wrong to protect a business model, while doing the same when it's good for business model.
When there is no clear right or wrong way, all ways are in a grey zone, aka each side consider their way is legitimate.
Both are obviously wrong, none are right either.




Member since:
2010-06-08
Shouldn't it be the fair use case? When you paid for the DVD, what do they care if you use libdvdcss to play it? Or may be they know another way to do it in an open source OS without paying anything extra just for the right "to play DVD"? Users didn't choose CSS DRM, it's forced on them by the industry. Obviously if users need to de-CSS it just in order to watch the legally purchased content - they will.
Edited 2012-05-10 15:13 UTC