Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th May 2012 18:06 UTC
Windows Both Mozilla and Google have expressed concern over Windows 8. Microsoft's next big operating system release restricts access to certain APIs and technologies browsers need - only making them available to Internet Explorer. Looking at the facts, it would seem Mozilla and Google have a solid case - coincidentally, the responses on the web are proof of the slippery slope we're on regarding ownership over our own machines.
E-mail Print r 13   · Read More · 90 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 517668
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by shmerl
by nej_simon on Thu 10th May 2012 18:37 UTC in reply to "Comment by shmerl"
nej_simon
Member since:
2011-02-11

Probably because Microsoft have a near-monopoly on desktop OSes.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by shmerl
by tomcat on Thu 10th May 2012 20:19 in reply to "RE: Comment by shmerl"
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

Probably because Microsoft have a near-monopoly on desktop OSes.


Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on ARM-based operating systems. Go back and read the court rulings. It only covers x86/AMD processors.

Edited 2012-05-10 20:21 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 10th May 2012 20:27 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

"Probably because Microsoft have a near-monopoly on desktop OSes.


Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on ARM-based operating systems. Go back and read the court rulings. It only covers x86/AMD processors.
"

Reading Daring Fireball, are we ;) .

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by fossil on Fri 11th May 2012 00:33 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
fossil Member since:
2009-05-29

1) I am not a laywer

2) Whether or not MS has a monopoly on ARM may not be relevant. Actually being a monopoly is not illegal in the U.S. What is illegal is being an abusive monopoly. That's what brought on the MS anti-trust action, in which MS was found guilty. Abuse of monopoly includes (but ain't limited to) forcing competitors out of business by predatory pricing (like $0.00 for IE, which put Netscape out of business), tying products (WIN 95 and IE) --seems like this may apply to "walled gardens" but like I said, IANAL; vertical restraints ... the US DOJ has a 215p. pdf online, for those who wish to know details.

Reply Parent Score: 2