To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
shmerl,
"Which translates to - no Google's or Mozilla's JavaScript VM can be used, which translates to - alternative browsers are banned."
The situation already resembles what's happened with apple devices. Third party apps, such as browsers, will undoubtedly lack integration functionality that MS gives itself.
Not to justify microsoft's policy at all, but it's technically not as severe as apple's because microsoft hasn't explicitly banned all forms of emulators. This means that Java/Javascript/VMs aren't completely prohibited, they just have to be parsed or emulated instead of running natively using JIT-compilation. While this is a definite disadvantage, at least emulation isn't prohibited.
I've been criticized for saying this in the past, but I'm with Thom in pressuring government to step in and set boundaries on how far companies are allowed to go in restricting owners & developers. Government intervention is a far call from perfect or ideal, but the harm caused the absolute lack of intervention is much worse than imperfect legislation aiming to protect consumers.




Member since:
2010-06-08
From the iOS SDK license:
Which translates to - no Google's or Mozilla's JavaScript VM can be used, which translates to - alternative browsers are banned. Note - we are talking about the SDK. So they are banned legally even from compilation, less alone from distribution through the Apple's store. So even if Google or Mozilla decided to use Cydia for their browsers, they still can't do it, since they can't even legally compile them.
Edited 2012-05-10 19:32 UTC