Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th May 2012 23:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 517788
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-08
So what. They can expand their brand in any way they see fit.
Legacy Windows software has nothing to do with anything. There's no requirement that a new Windows product must support legacy Windows software.
"Windows" is nothing more than the name of a product line. Microsoft decides what's "Windows" and what isn't. They make the rules when it comes to their own products, naming, etc. I think people forget that fact from time to time.