Linked by diegocg on Sun 13th May 2012 23:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 518067
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-03-10
I humbly disagree.
As far as I'm concerned it's a) taking much of the suckiness out of traditional sysvinit which is layers upon layers of shell hacks while b) being relatively lean (most of the extra stuff people complain about are just small programs bundled with the systemd source and don't affect the daemon) and c) standardizing some of the stupid different-because-noone-coordinated differences between distributions that just waste time for everyone.
It's like we had 40 years to collect dust bunnies and now finally someone comes along with the big vacuum cleaner. I expect that in a couple of years, my base system will boot much faster, consume less resources, support more dynamic features, be less confusing and overall more friendly.