To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think you're right. Apple will insist they had more rights to the iTV brand than the UK-based ITV broadcasting company...
Whilst on the subject of branding, I must say that I'm not overly impressed by Apple's branding - sticking an "i" in front of everything doesn't make it cool. Will customers be queuing up for the next iSee or rather last year's iSaw. (iSore?). I suppose if they invented a hitech shiny hoover with built in wifi and gestures, they'd call it the iSuck?
Also the same-same "Apple look" is starting to bore. I admit they make nice products, but can I have it in black or brushed metal? Maybe a nice minimalist apple logo in the corner rather than the fat glowing apple in the middle (also conveniently featured in nearly every movie - product placement alert!). Maybe some serious customisation options of their OS might make it more interesting too.
So yeah - I think Apple could perhaps come up with a new look, concept, whatever...time for something fresh!
Cheers
Christopher
I think i fits them very well - after all, i stands for "imaginary" (also: i^2 = -1 )
Well they know it works... perhaps better than some other companies:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092007/trivia
Though the above is probably apocryphal, in the sense that it's more likely Apple paid for product placement - since the studio definitely had Amigas on hand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AMacintosh_Plus#Evidences_th...
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=22149&page=3
Too bad I can't find again one ~indy movie in which BeOS was used by main characters...




Member since:
2005-07-06
the iTV trademark is already taken. Not that it will stop them using it and settling out of court later.