Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th May 2012 22:49 UTC
Windows For weeks - if not months - I've been trying to come up with a way to succinctly and accurately explain why, exactly, Windows 8 rubs me the wrong way, usability-wise. I think I finally got it.
Thread beginning with comment 518316
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Desktop/Laptop Users
by redshift on Wed 16th May 2012 01:40 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Desktop/Laptop Users"
redshift
Member since:
2006-05-06

Um, why vertical? When I use my iPad, it's reclined at about a 20 degree angle, and it's quite comfortable to move things around with my hands directly. Why wouldn't a 30" flatscreen monitor be similarly inclined and manipulated directly rather than using a mouse?


Because now the top of it is 30" away and everything is in perspective. Your eye compensates for this much better with a small device. Just tilt your monitor back an pretend it is a touch screen. That is not ergonomic at all.

Touch screens have been around for quite a while... but they only caught on when they could fit elegantly in your hand. Why do you think that is?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Desktop/Laptop Users
by ricegf on Wed 16th May 2012 10:11 in reply to "RE[4]: Desktop/Laptop Users"
ricegf Member since:
2007-04-25

Cost, primarily.

I've worked on touchscreens since NASA in the 1980's, and the affordable models really haven't worked well until the past decade - and there only on small form factors.

I just bought a dozen 30" 2560x1600 touchscreen models at work, and they are STILL very pricey - the touch surface is sold separately, in fact. It's just not economical to put touch on workstation monitors, even today.

When touch is a nominal plus-up, then we'll see if a desktop touch interface can gain traction in the mass market (other than kiosks and such). I'm not sure it can, but I certainly lack your confidence that it can't.

We'll see.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Desktop/Laptop Users
by zima on Mon 21st May 2012 23:40 in reply to "RE[5]: Desktop/Laptop Users"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

touchscreens [...] NASA

Well, at least in 0g (or low g, like Moon or maybe still Mars) there shouldn't be many issues with gorilla arm... ;)

Not like I'm dismissive of the general large touchscreen UI idea, not at all - glance over some of my replies in this thread (and BTW, the display tech of MS Surface 2.0 should bring low prices, eventually: among the usual pixels, the panel has also microcams that detect objects; essentially production methods as present mass-produced LCDs) - but there are some issues / but then it might be awesome / yeah, we'll see.


(I'm surprised MS didn't present ISS crew with Surface 2.0 already ;) )

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Desktop/Laptop Users
by zima on Mon 21st May 2012 23:42 in reply to "RE[4]: Desktop/Laptop Users"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Because now the top of it is 30" away and everything is in perspective. Your eye compensates for this much better with a small device.

This wasn't a problem with pre-CAD drawing boards. And I can imagine that "form factor" returning to CAD stations, with large touchscreens.

Reply Parent Score: 2