Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th May 2012 07:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 518394
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Comment by MOS6510
by kwan_e on Wed 16th May 2012 15:03
in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by MOS6510"
you label them a patent troll, I don't.
Lie. I didn't call them patent troll. I disagreed with you, but doesn't mean I agreed with Thom either.
This is another example of your black and white thinking. If I disagree with you, I must agree with Thom.
I'd say they abused a patent once.
Microsoft and Apple et al? They abused A patent ONCE? ONCE, you say? A patent, you say?
RE[10]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 16th May 2012 15:23
in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by MOS6510"




Member since:
2011-05-12
That's not black/white thinking, quite the opposite. I accept that companies abuse or misuse patents. Because I don't think black/white I don't want to put any labels on companies just like that.
If a company abuses a patent once Thom and you label them a patent troll, I don't. I'd say they abused a patent once. If a company's business is to abuse patents then I'd label them a patent troll, because they don't do anything else making the label a fitting description because people then know what we're talking about. They don't when they talk to Thom or you, because then patent troll can mean anything.