Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th May 2012 11:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 518405
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-30
I think they could two do very different sizes and catch no attacks at all. keep the 3.5" and do a 4.6-4.8". nobody gets hurt, and size queens get a big screen.
going from 4.5" to 4.6" to 4.8" doesnt mean the phone looks or feels huge. http://www.phone-size.com/?s=1%2C7%2C83%2C104
both htc one x and galaxy s3 are big 4.7" and 4.8" screens. sizes have been growing steadily over time, but wont pass galaxy note's 5.3". I wouldn't be surprised if apple has found the ideal large size and launches this year. they've looked dated for long enough. but I also wouldnt be surprised if they launch a sissy 4.5"
if samsung hadn't gotten the "note" name I feel like apple would have made ipad note or iphone note and changed the world forever. it is that good (galaxy note, that is)