Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th May 2012 16:50 UTC, submitted by martini
Thread beginning with comment 518528
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I guess really the only true differentiator they could come up with is raw dhtml / canvas performance, that's one of Android's uncovered flanks.
By delivering order of magnitude better performance they could have a selling point and maybe tempt some app houses to pour more energy into their mobile web interfaces.
It will be curious to see how competing HTML heavy platforms try to distinguish themselves, yet provide opportunity for portability that seems to be the underlying premise behind an HTML based application platform (once you get beyond base line familiarity).
And the pain to make CSS+HTML+JavaScript work in a consistent state across multiple browsers and operating systems.





Member since:
2005-07-06
It will be curious to see how competing HTML heavy platforms try to distinguish themselves, yet provide opportunity for portability that seems to be the underlying premise behind an HTML based application platform (once you get beyond base line familiarity).
If Tizen and WebOS can come to some reasonable common ground in terms of platform features as exposed via HTML5, then app writers can target both, and device makers can focus on other issues than app availability in terms of platform choice. But if they're still racing to distinguish themselves in to oblivion, I don't know what else could be done.