Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st May 2012 20:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519071
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-01
While I agree that this is stupid, I still don't think it's a sign that the desktop will die in the future. It's just a sign that Microsoft (and really the industry in general, but especially Microsoft) is terrible at promoting the new shiny without (temporarily) taking all the oxygen away from its existing investments. We've seen this before when (including some non-Microsoft stuff that Microsoft and the industry were promoting)
* COM was going to kill Win32
* IE/HTML was going to kill native development
* Java was going to kill everything
* .NET was going to kill COM and Win32
* WPF/XAML was going to kill HTML
* HTML was going to kill XAML, .NET and Win32
yet all of those are (a) still around and (b) coexist without any of them killing each other. This will be the same, in a few years they will have another new baby, we will all get really sick of them trying to make us look at the new baby pictures 24/7, and Metro style apps will just be another boring "old" (but hopefully still alive and improving) thing just like the desktop is now.
Edited 2012-05-23 01:05 UTC