Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd May 2012 21:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519202
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow
by WorknMan on Thu 24th May 2012 00:54
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow"
So why doesn't Adobe hand over the source code to Flash to Mozilla, Opera and Apple? Why doesn't Adobe simply release it under an OSI-approved license?
As long as there was one, and only one version of Flash, tweaked only when absolutely necessary to make it cross-platform, and not 30 different forks of it.
RE[4]: Comment by ssokolow
by 0brad0 on Thu 24th May 2012 01:04
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow"
"
So why doesn't Adobe hand over the source code to Flash to Mozilla, Opera and Apple? Why doesn't Adobe simply release it under an OSI-approved license?
So why doesn't Adobe hand over the source code to Flash to Mozilla, Opera and Apple? Why doesn't Adobe simply release it under an OSI-approved license?
As long as there was one, and only one version of Flash, tweaked only when absolutely necessary to make it cross-platform, and not 30 different forks of it. "
Adobe failed at doing that even under their own control.
RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow
by lucas_maximus on Thu 24th May 2012 09:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow"
RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow
by henderson101 on Thu 24th May 2012 10:17
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow"
So why doesn't Adobe hand over the source code to Flash to Mozilla, Opera and Apple? Why doesn't Adobe simply release it under an OSI-approved license?
Opensourcing isn't a magic bullet. It will undermine Adobe's business model (and if you license the code from them, they have always allowed external companies to use the Flash engine.) You may not like or agree with Adobe creating closed source software and platforms, but you need to appreciate that changing the model for a specific product line is not done on a whim.
I'm guessing all of the companies you list could also license the source from Adobe. I also assume they don't because Adobe provide a free plugin for the majority of the world's consumer platforms. Of those excluded, many specifically do not support Flash by choice (iOS) or have some kind of support (Linux via Chrome.)





Member since:
2007-02-17
So why doesn't Adobe hand over the source code to Flash to Mozilla, Opera and Apple? Why doesn't Adobe simply release it under an OSI-approved license?