Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 14:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519506
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Compatibility and closed minds
by Neolander on Sat 26th May 2012 07:51
in reply to "RE: Compatibility and closed minds"
RE[3]: Compatibility and closed minds
by Soulbender on Sat 26th May 2012 10:14
in reply to "RE[2]: Compatibility and closed minds"
RE[2]: Compatibility and closed minds
by moondevil on Mon 28th May 2012 10:41
in reply to "RE: Compatibility and closed minds"
RE[2]: Compatibility and closed minds
by renox on Tue 29th May 2012 09:10
in reply to "RE: Compatibility and closed minds"
posix layer has existed for a very long time. MS has a gigantic case of NIH due to its desire to lock in its users.
You totally misunderstood my post, I was pointing out that PowerShell should have been a wake-up call for Unix users: it shows that relying on objects instead of text to pipe between executables has many advantages, but nearly nobody thought about it seriously as it comes from Microsoft..
I despise Microsoft as a company too, but this doesn't mean that the technical idea behind PowerShell isn't good, IMHO it has many advantages over the traditionnal text based Unix interfaces.




Member since:
2006-01-06
posix layer has existed for a very long time. MS has a gigantic case of NIH due to its desire to lock in its users.