Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th May 2012 21:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519511
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Perhaps I can see their point here... everybody wants to bring the next hot thing, and I can imagine "Metro 3.0" + the display tech of MS Surface 2.0 (should bring low prices, eventually: among the usual pixels, the panel has also microcams that detect objects; essentially the production methods of present mass-produced LCDs) as being just that, before this decade ends.
(and it would explain the apparent "forcing" of Metro now, to prepare the landscape)
It might be even awesome, we'll see.
Edited 2012-05-26 00:08 UTC