To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As far as I'm concerned, a web browser with "integrated", unremovable Facebook functionality is exactly like a phone OS with the same "feature", which already exists. So it seems that the market is there.
However, I can't wait to hear about a variant of Cyanogenmod for web browsers if that would happen
Edited 2012-05-26 07:40 UTC
Oh, I hate the word, "apps".
A while ago, the facebook app was quite different from the site. Nowadays, the site and the app are exactly the same. So, I really wonder if it is just a "site-dedicated-browser" indeed.
As for facebook-opera. I hope Opera will remain independent. No facebook browser please. Besides all of that, from my experience, it always felt to me opera was less-supported by facebook then gecko or webkit based browsers.




Member since:
2007-11-23
What a reduculous idea would be for users to have "site-dedicated" browser. Total nonsense. And it doesn't matter how juge is the community focused around that site.
Now, I can perfectly understand motives and intensions: Facebook's incentive for world internet domination, but that just doesn't sound right. It reminds me of Netscape and AOL. People thought that Netscape/AOL *is the actual internet*.