Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519748
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: UK Equal Opportunity practice is not a bad model
by JAlexoid on Tue 29th May 2012 03:39
in reply to "RE: UK Equal Opportunity practice is not a bad model"
RE[2]: UK Equal Opportunity practice is not a bad model
by M.Onty on Tue 29th May 2012 12:16
in reply to "RE: UK Equal Opportunity practice is not a bad model"
""First: we had to monitor and record the ethnic, gender, and where known sexual orientation, of our workforce at regular intervals.
This was all mandatory? As in, you were forced to answer these questions if you were to work there? I'm actually fairly sure Dutch employers cannot force you to answer questions like this, nor to keep a record of it, nor to publish such records. Mind you, I'm not sure!
"
Nah, its just the last sheet on the application form you fill in. You can ignore it completely, you can describe yourself as part maori, part eskimo, part scouse if you so desire. Your answers won't be associated with your name when published. There's no personal consequences to filling in the form, falsely or otherwise, or leaving it blank.
I have to say I've only ever seen the race one (usually something like [White British / Irish / Black British / Asian British / Other]) on job application forms. There is the ocasional question about religion/denomination elsewhere, but that's pretty irrelevent as most just write 'CofE' to make the question go away.
Edited 2012-05-29 12:17 UTC




Member since:
2005-06-29
While I'm sure the entire system as you described had a positive outcome, I'm very concerned at step 1:
) would ask me my sexual orientation and record and publish my answer would make me very, very nervous. In due time, if I ever reach the point where I would start hiring people, I would never even dare to institutionalise such questioning.
"First: we had to monitor and record the ethnic, gender, and where known sexual orientation, of our workforce at regular intervals. These stats were published along side similar population stats so that everyone could see which social groups were being under represented."
This was all mandatory? As in, you were forced to answer these questions if you were to work there? I'm actually fairly sure Dutch employers cannot force you to answer questions like this, nor to keep a record of it, nor to publish such records. Mind you, I'm not sure!
The idea that my hypothetical boss (I'm actually self-employed in a female-dominated industry