Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519757
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
The premise of the article is incorrect, affirmative action isn't there because women are seen as any less capable, it's there to offset existing imbalances and unfair practices. It's a corrective measure.
Whenever one of these stories about how there aren't enough women in IT comes out I'm surprised at just how low the numbers are. In almost all of the offices I've worked in over the past ten years or so the IT departments have featured a relatively strong percentage of women in their ranks. Usually in the range of 25% - 50% of the IT staff have been female. Personally I haven't felt there is a difference, professionally speaking, working with women vs men.
In fact, the IT departments I've worked in are usually much more gender-balanced than the accounting departments, legal departments, HR departments and scientific departments in those same offices. Those I've noticed tend to be exclusively one gender or the other.