Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 14:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519805
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by kurkosdr
by tidux on Tue 29th May 2012 10:50
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kurkosdr"




Member since:
2006-10-08
You don't have to. Home directories can be spread across many disks, they can even be placed on "no (local) disk" (see NFS home).
True, there are options to do it differently. For example, PC-BSD utilizes a concept as what you are suggesting. Still this may have disadvantages, e. g. doubled and tripled libraries. But as hard disk space is cheap, nobody sees a problem in this.
However, the traditional layout has advantages and intended baheviour, even if it's hard to see this on modern Linux where, as you said, things tend to be thrown into one pot.
Allow me to point you to the FreeBSD file system hierarchy documentation, "man 7 hier", for a more detailed description about what the different directories should be used for:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=hier&sektion=7
In addition to them, some systems even use /opt (directory initially coming from Solaris, if I remember correctly) to manually manage software that is not handled by the system's software magement facilities, so avoiding problems with standard tools.